Postdoctoral researcher at Uppsala University and the Swedish Institute for Social Research
MY RESEARCH ON LGBTQ+ POPULATIONS
​​​
One strand of my research aims to bring visibility to LGBTQ+ populations that are often overlooked in national statistics and academic research. This work is interdisciplinary, recognizing how social, legal, and medical institutions interact to uniquely shape LGBTQ+ people's lives. I collaborate with economists, sociologists, and medical researchers and practitioners. My current focus is on the life circumstances of transgender people who seek gender-affirming health care or obtain legal gender recognition in Sweden. This research is supported by grants from FORTE, the Swedish Research Council, and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS
Transgender parents in Sweden: Insights from administrative data.
GENUS, forthcoming. Co-authored with Ylva Moberg and Emma von Essen.
The end of an impossible choice: Removing infertility as a prerequisite for legal gender recognition.
AEA Papers & Proceedings, vol. 115, May 2025. Co-authored with Ylva Moberg, Rinni Norlinder, and Emma von Essen.
​
The demography of Sweden's transgender population: A research note on patterns, changes, and sociodemographics. Demography, vol. 62(2), April 2025. Co-authored with Martin Kolk, Emma von Essen, Ylva Moberg, and Ian Burn.
WP version: Stockholm Research Reports in Demography No. 2023:22. Media: Medical Xpress. Landets Fria. QX​​
​
WORKING PAPERS
Labor market trajectories before and after gender-affirming care. Co-authored with Ian Burn, Emma von Essen, and Ylva Moberg.Status: Revising the draft.
Abstract: Using administrative data from Sweden, we document labor market trajectories before and after the first recorded diagnosis of gender incongruence, which we use as a proxy for the initiation of gender-affirming care. We track employment, earnings, and economic self-sufficiency for transgender men and women before and after the first diagnosis of gender incongruence, using an event-study design to measure the changes in labor market outcomes relative to a matched cisgender sample. Prior to initiating gender-affirming care, transgender individuals already showed lower employment and earnings, and after treatment begins, the gaps widen significantly. Relative employment declines in the two years after initiating care and remains stable in subsequent years. Relative earnings decline as well, following the same pattern as employment. The decline is larger for transgender women than for transgender men. The widening of the gaps in labor market outcomes reflects two factors: i) declines in employment and earnings among transgender individuals who were employed when they initiated gender-affirming care, and ii) slow employment and earnings growth among transgender individuals who enter the labor market after initiating gender-affirming care. Obtaining gender-affirming hormones or surgeries and legal gender recognition is not correlated with outcomes for transgender women, but is correlated with smaller declines in relative employment and earnings for transgender men. Mechanism tests suggest a limited role for occupational sorting and firm characteristics, and changes in health explain only a small fraction of the observed declines in relative outcomes. The results highlight the economic vulnerability transgender individuals face during medical transitions.
National administrative data in research on transgender people: A matter of measure and time? Co-authored with Emma von Essen*, Ian Burn, and Ylva Moberg. * denotes the lead author. Revise & resubmit at Population Research and Policy Review. Pre-print not publicly available. Draft available upon request.
Abstract: The use of administrative data is increasingly common in transgender research, providing a specific perspective on measuring transgender populations. This study examines how measures of transgender populations using administrative data capture different sociodemographic characteristics over time and around gender transitions. Using population-wide data from Sweden between 2005 and 2019, we compare sociodemographic characteristics with three different measurement strategies to identify the transgender population. The basis of these measurements includes the following markers of trans experiences: gender dysphoria diagnosis, medical treatment, and legal sex change. Our analytical approach involves two regression-based methods: examining sociodemographic differences between the general population and transgender samples over time and performing an event history analysis. Our main findings suggest that when researchers examine transgender demographics or compare results across studies, they should consider three key factors. First, significant sociodemographic changes occur over two historical time points for the transgender population, but these do not depend on the measurement used. Second, in an event history study, the choice of measurement can influence the results. Last, sex assigned at birth influences the differences observed in measurements during an event history analysis.
SELECTED WORK IN PROGRESS
​
Legal gender recognition with or without mandated sterilization: Impacts on transgender health and earnings
(with Ylva Moberg, Rinni Norlinder, and Emma von Essen)